This is going to be one of the most complicated posts I have tried so far and I am beginning it in fear and trepidation. The war against the rich is quite simple and very easy to track. The war against the poor is much more subtle and complex, and I wanted this blog to be easy to read and understand for beginners in the field of political analysis. So please bear with me here. I will be connecting the dots. It is unlikely that I will be able to present my basic thoughts on this subject in just one post. It may even take two or three. Jesus Christ is quoted as saying— “the poor we have always with us.” I don’t think this is necessarily a given in our society so you see I am going to disagree with Jesus. Setting out my reasons will take some space.
How shall we define “poor?” Rich and poor are such relative terms, dependent upon many differing factors such as cultural expectations(this is a big one), cultural standards, (these vary from place to place), exposure to comparison groups, public focus on select issues, etc.. Perhaps best stated by a quote of some antiquity which is… “I thought I was poor because I had no shoes until I met a man who had no feet.”
Here in America lately, we have had much public wailing about “The Poor” in capital letters, without any sort of definition as to what exactly defines “poor” to these people. The same goes for legislative rhetoric about “The Rich.” I will condense the howlings of the past fifty years or so into a workable definition for the purposes of this blog. We will start at the top, most public layer and work our way down. I will be giving some tried and true methods of self-defense also because people who get to feeling poor can use some encouragement. I don’t mean to just yak about this war, I mean to offer some weapons that can be used against the aggressors.
We may take the idea of poverty as those people who feel themselves divorced from or shut out of, direct legislative authority. We may also take the idea of “rich” to encompass those the public feels are in control of this process. Most people feel disempowered and helpless to make the changes necessary to regain some control over their finances and their lives, ergo, they feel poor. Voters all over this country fall under this heading regardless of their income.
Congress is running wild, ignoring the wishes of the electorate and following an agenda not approved by the people for the benefit of a select group which Congress is pleased to call “the poor” but which most Americans know really means “the rich” per the definitions I just gave. Right now, when these few instigators on Capitol Hill say “poor” what they really mean is “those without health insurance.” Your first weapon will be to publicly refute this special interest definition.
A select few in Washington D. C., led by Obama, a group of women, and a few token males are attempting to ram socialized medicine down the throats of Americans using “The Poor” as an emotional catch-all phrase. They do not address any basic issues such as asking hard questions as to why health care became so overpriced in the first place. We hear nothing about the huge overpricing practises of the big drug companies. We hear nothing about the overpricing of medical equipment. We hear nothing about lowering the cost of health care itself by addressing the enormous price affixed to malpractice insurance that no doctor will practise without today or the judicial rulings and settlements that drove it up to begin with. These are the underlying issues involved but this Obama fronted women’s group has been very careful to direct public focus away from and not towards them. Americans know this but most have lost sight of the underpinning behind this insurance scam now before us in the name of healthcare, and this creates the feeling of disfranchisement that we all are reacting to.
This feeling of malaise has been created very deliberately, a fact which almost all Americans know at some level. This is what drives most of our resentment against “the rich.” Our first line of defense in the War Against the Poor, and it will be very effective if implemented, is to refocus our attention on the items I have italicized above and to refuse to allow the professional politicians to sidetrack us with the emotionally based redirection tactics at which they all excel. Those of you who are not doing so now, need to turn a deaf ear to the specious, alligator tears tactics of these few women and their token males when they start in about ” X—- NUMBERS OF AMERICANS HAVE NO HEALTH INSURANCE!” Sob, Sob, Sob. These bleeding hearts do not care about “the poor” and do not seek to benefit them. The only people they seek to benefit from health insurance are the big insurance companies. Here in New England we have our own definition of SOB’s. Think of this when these sob sisters turn on the public tears.
Sick people need medicine and/or medical attention, not insurance. Healthy people don’t even need that. In this particular campaign in the War Against the Poor, the big insurance companies and their lobbyists/politicians have brought out their very biggest guns–lack of hindsight/foresight by the average voter, public misdirection of needed focus areas, fear, and financial insecurity. And they have done all this, not to improve our health, but to guarantee an investable capital base for their own profit. These tactics are very cheap but very, very effective in manipulating the public. What we need to do is insist that legislatures focus on the causes of inflated medical related pricing in every related healthcare field, and not quibble about more insurance that will only continue to inflate this wholly unnecessary gravy train.
A certain group of power investors artificially drove up the price of our healthcare to begin with, also deliberately, and they did that about 20 to 25 years ago. Remember, you are dealing with international corporations and they think twenty to fifty years ahead in their major game plans. Average people don’t generally do so and that leaves them at a huge disadvantage, which the big multinationals take full advantage of. Here is another self-defense weapon for the poor–when a given issue appears in the public arena, there is always an historical, political, legislative or financial background to it, going back several years. Look for the history if you want to fight effectively. The information you need will be available in the public records if you bother to hunt for it, and you will begin to feel much more empowered and much less like David against Goliath.
I have given here just a few examples of the weapons used by certain groups and individuals against the people in the war against the poor along with some very effective counter measures. In my next post, I will try to enlarge on some of the topics presented.
Next post—-The War Against The Poor…continued.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Read Full Post »
The War Against Men — Cheap at the Price
Posted in War Stories, tagged conservative commentary,, entertainment industry, groping, Hollywood, lawsuit, Matt Damon, Matt Lauer, scandal, sexual assault on January 1, 2018| Leave a Comment »
For the last several weeks, about a month or so is it, the American viewing public has been forced to listen to a lot of whining from females who say they were “assaulted” sexually by a Hollywood A-Lister or other high profile personality.
First of all, these allegations are years, literally years, old before anyone hears about them. Secondly, the media reports them as if they were actually true and most of us will believe them. These so called sexual assaulters(Do they mean rape here? The media and “victims” are just a little vague about this point) are assumed to be guilty by the media on the incontrovertible evidence of being accused. The broadcast media has lost ALL and I do mean ALL credibility. They have now fallen as low as they can go. Their opinions do not matter to most of us and as they have long since given up reporting any facts at all they are now officially past their use by date.
It is hardly worth saying, but I will anyway, that if a female does not feel “assaulted” enough to report an incident at the time of occurrence we need not disturb ourselves if she suddenly sees some political or financial advantage to reporting it several years after the fact. I notice we are not being inundated with accusations of groping against janitors, fast food workers, or the men who manage the city’s plumbing and sewage systems. There is not a lot of press coverage, money, or glamour to be had out of these guys so maybe that’s why? I would also like to know why these poor “victims” didn’t slap the guys face if he was being an ass. It works wonders when applied properly..
The worst of it is that sexual assault, rape, is a filthy, violent and totally reasonless crime and this obviously false, specious, and publicity mongering slop is a cruel mockery of genuine victims. These women are false accusers, making themselves holy at no cost to themselves and at extreme cost to the men they accuse with out foundation. The media is falsely accusing these men as well for the sake of a juicy high profile scandal which we all know makes a great story. And since any slattern can come forward ten years after the fact and create this kind of a mess about any man in the public eye, the possibilities for future stories are just about limitless. No one except Matt Damon has had the guts to say something about this travesty. He has my fullest support. That took real courage. The kind of moral courage these female “victims” did not show and the media has never had.
The women feel holy for “speaking out”. Airheads everywhere feel holy for approving. The media is giving themselves all kinds of holy airs for “reporting” this “news.” Not a real fact in sight. Doesn’t cost any of them a damn thing, this holiness. Cheap at the price eh?
A. FARWELL
Rate this:
Share this:
Like this:
Read Full Post »