Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for December, 2011

If you check out the dates on my posts you will see that I have taken a hiatus from blogging for about a month, maybe six weeks, I didn’t count. To tell the truth, I did get a little discouraged. That happens to all of us at times I guess. With the presidential election coming up I just have to add my mite of wisdom to the main stream of public consciousness, mainly because I still do not see any real in-depth analysis of news stories and more important still, any historical connotations to previous events.

For instance, I just posted my last blog entry to Facebook. It contains a thought on the Cain debacle for the discerning among you out there. I will share this one as well. It is a reminder to all those who wondered, as I did, just why the Monica Lewinsky(spelling?) saga during the Clinton administration got so much and such lasting media air time. I never got the impression that it was a genuine attempt to rid us of the Hill/Billy team from Arkansas and yet someone was definitely after something by it. Now we know. It was Newt Gingrich they were gunning for. Evidently, Mr. Gingrich was a person for the super rich gay element to fear enough to neutralize, even then. Most voters don’t seem to realize that presidential candidates are basically chosen about twenty years or so in advance by the various business interests that back them, so this little nugget is very revealing. The potential opposition for such candidates will of course also coalesce from the same time.

Personally, I more or less bought into the mess at the time and tended to write Mr. Gingrich off as an also-ran among political contenders in the conservative party. However, I caught a speech he gave to the Heritage Foundation this past summer and was really very impressed. He was articulate and well-informed about his subject matter and presented his views with sense and moderation. Then I started to rethink old impressions gathered only from media presentations and stories about him. Which led me to wonder why he had always been so belittled by the media, which led me to research a little, which brought up Monica and Co., and then the light went on.

Mr. Gingrich was perceived as a threat to liberal/gay partisans even then and as they could not really attack him, at the time, they put on the Monica morality play for us and privately leaned on the man, through unpublicized pressure applied by the RINO’s already in the GOP, to resign his current position because of it. Which he did.

Does anyone remember hearing the term RINO during the Monica days? I don’t but then I was not really attending at the time because the liberal/gay consortium had not really emerged from their closet yet. Now they have unmasked their main batteries, so to speak, and Newt Gingrich is viewed by them as being capable of putting a severe cramp in their sob sister media style.

My opinion? This is the chief and major reason the liberal/gays do not want to deal with the man. I see articles calling Mr. Gingrich “divisive.” This is an attempt to frighten republicans into avoiding him. So this should give you thinking conservative republicans all the reason you will need to give the man your unqualified support. Do your research. Listen to his recorded speeches and lectures rather than relying solely on media stories and presentations as I once did. You may be pleasantly surprised. As I was.

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

%d bloggers like this: